| Author
|
Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
conspiracies unlimited

Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Posts: 4281
Location: California |
Don't worry about it... five or ten pages into my book, my main character gets a serious beat down... Hell I'm even toying with killing him off... though I don't know how that will affect future books... This is the first book, and IF I ever get around to finishing it, and IF I get it published, AND IF it does well, I plan on writting more books about this asshole... YES, my main character is an ASSHOLE... He really isn't very likable... in fact, thats why I had him get beat... It made me feel good, deep deep down in my soul... Why, becuase the fucker deserved it... not that the people had reason to beat him, but because he's a dick...
Go ahead man, beat the crap out of your character... its good for the soul... _________________ You are so whack.Wiggity whack?Nope, just the regular kind.
You can't dust for vomit
This is the Governor's wife. -- You mean she's not the hooker?
It's time to separate the awkwardly feminine from the possibly canadian
|
Fri Apr 01, 2005 5:29 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chris
Site Admin

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 3833
Location: People Republic of Northern California |
|
|
|
FBz. I've said it here before, but maybe it bears repeating here. I had to rewrite the whole beginning of both Coyote Blue and Love Nun because the characters were basically unlikable (and they were way more likable than your guy). Your main character can be a misanthrope, and a rascal to be sure, but if the reader can't root for him then you are hosed.
Seems to me that Martin Amis wrote a couple of early books that had unlikable characters -- (Cigarettes -out of print), Money and London Fields. I actually liked Money, because the narrator's voice was so entertaining that you started to root for him, and eventually he is redeemed. I didn't even get through London Fields, because the main character seemed beyond hope. Here's the trap. If you write an unlikeable character, he has to be so clever and entertaining that the reader wants to stick with him, is even afraid that his own flaws will undo him. No matter what, we have to be rooting for him.
You have to draw a line between a flawed anti-hero like Updike's Rabbit, Salinger's Holden Caufield, or some of the more desperate characters in Cheever and Roth, and complete assholes. (I haven't read The Human Stain, but the title gives little promise for a hero to root for. I'm sure some boardies can chime in.)
Ultimately, people respond to moral fiction. This is one of the few times where you will ever see me use the word "moral". You're character can be cynical, crude, even selfish, as long as he ultimately makes the right decisions, does the right thing, or tries to. The voice you used by example is a little harsh, but it doesn't condemn your character as long as he turns his contempt on the bad guys or the bad deeds. Andrew Vachs and George Pelicanos write some really harsh main characters, and Vachs' in particular seem to border on being psychopaths, so obsessed are they with their self-proclaimed missions, yet these guys have lots of readers. By the same token, I quit reading James Ellroy's books or watching the Sopranos because I couldn't find anyone to root for. Everyone was scum.
I think it's particularly important to give the reader something to hold onto in the first few pages of the book so he or she will stay with your character. What that is, I leave up to you. I resorted to actually going back in Coyote Blue and inserting the line, "It wasn't that he was a bad guy, it was just that you could never get close to him, etc. etc." In other words, I just resorted to telling the reader that even though Sam appeared to be a bit of a dick, he was not.
I can also tell you that as long as your character makes decisions that the reader can identify with, then you can always fix character flaws in rewrite. Sometimes it's as easy as taking a really harsh line of dialogue and adding, "he said with a grin" afterward. Sort of the equivalent of the in email and chat posts. Takes the edge off, implies a sense of humor.
|
Sun Apr 03, 2005 7:32 pm |
|
|
|
|
chris
Site Admin

Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 3833
Location: People Republic of Northern California |
| funbagz wrote: |
Thank you for the advice. The reason my character is a little cold is because life keeps grinding him into the dirt. I try to show later on in the book that he was a nice guy, but a very unique situation has turned him into a self loathing detached asshole. The character has a good reason to be an asshole, but I'm afraid the reader might not stick around to find out why.
If anyone wants to read what I have so fare copied from my messy notepads to a word processor, I could put it in the fan fiction thing. It's about 40 pages and I still haven't rooted out all the grammer problems and other mistakes, though. |
No. Once you get 100 pages you can go back and fix stuff. Don't take critiques or do any rewrites yet. If you have ideas for changes, make notes, but there's no sense rewriting stuff now when you don't know where the book is gonig to go and you may have to rewrite it again and again anyway. Just keep going, and if you want to lighten the character up, make that decision and go back and change the first 40 later. You're right, forty pages is too long to have him be a prick unless you say that there's a reason and he's a very entertaining prick.
Are you writing a book or really polished first chapters? Onward, I say. Onward!
|
Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:41 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|